🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' innocence". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban remains "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to pass a proposal increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended families to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding statement calling for a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a good first step," said one MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any action must be "based on strong evidence".

Last year, support built behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the family of a girl who took her own life after encountering harmful platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are safe and suitable for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state government level due to national stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures mandating parental consent for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to follow Australia's example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from these regions, additional nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this international discussion continues, the policies of the Australian government and its followers indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly content to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.